Live streaming over the internet: game changing. (from marketingweek.co.uk ) |
Over the summer I enjoyed some of my team's pre-season friendlies on a free, direct stream on the club's website. My Everton-supporting friend has to pay $3 a friendly, so I think I got a better deal than him. And now the season has started, I've been enjoying more free streaming thanks to BT Sports (I was lucky enough to already have BT internet, so now I can watch it and stuff on my computer). Binging on football has become easier than ever before.
Now, I should confess: before was really quite shady. I have no great
respect for intellectual property laws. Nor am I sufficiently wealthy
to have a Sky subscription. The natural, inevitable result of these
two factors is that I have, in my time, tried to watch dodgy streams
of live football online. Mostly in Arabic. Or Russian. Not once has
the experience been satisfying. And the streams often, somewhat
alarmingly, cut out while your watching them.
The clubs are lucky that what they sell – the rights to live games
– are one-offs. Few people torrents football matches. But they
aren't taking full advantage of this. Sure, they sell TV rights to
companies around the world. But why have that middleman? Why don't
clubs sell their matches online directly to fans worldwide?
Football is notoriously bad at business. Apparently in the seventies
some of the sports companies managed to convince the clubs to not
only pay for their strips, but to pay a premium for them. The clubs
didn't realise that the advertising space on their shirts had value.
The incompetence is staggering.
They're
in a similar situation with broadcast rights at the moment though.
The current situation is bad for the fans and it's bad for the clubs.
For starters, streaming online would increase the revenues of those
clubs – like, say, Swansea – who are not 'big' enough to have
their matches shown on TV all the time, and it would allow all their
fans to see all their games, even if they couldn't go to the
stadium.1
It would also allow for a massive swelling of fanbase. This has
already been a trend of football in the last twenty years, with clubs
like Manchester United and Real Madrid becoming global brands. These
clubs have millions of fans around the world who aren't capable of
attending games. They would, and do, watch games though – and could
surely be convinced to buy online 'season tickets' allowing them to
view every match.
The
reason Facebook is valued at more than $80 billion not because they have high revenues (roughly $1.2 billion a quarter,
but increasing rapidly)
but because they have a vast customer base. The theory is that it is
easier to 'monetise' – rip off – customers you already have than
to acquire new ones. Football clubs are in a similar position. They
have large, loyal customer bases around the world. They need to get
on it.
1Although
it is true that fans in other countries perversely enjoy more
Premier League matches on TV than British fans do – NBC bought the
rights for every single Premier League game this season in America,
for example. I suspect, though, that most foreign fans, with the
exclusion of a limited number of expats, are fans of the top seven
or so clubs in the league.
No comments:
Post a Comment